In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin
Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> Other than the "20061103T213000Z" format for dates, what did you
>>change?
>
>I removed a redundant 'title'.
You removed the title from:
<a href="../solihull/indoor.htm"
title="Solihull Branch indoor meetings"
>
Since it's also in the original mark-up, it also has no bearing on the
increase in file size caused by adding uFs to the page. And, while it
may near-duplicate the linking text in this specific case, that won't
always be so.
>>> gzipped I get 293 vs 451 ratio 1.51
>>
>> So - still an increase of over 50%.
>>
>> That's not insignificant.
>
>In itself, it's not significant, as it is well under a packet size, as
>I said, and so will not affect download time.
Why is packet size relevant? The page concerned has many - and some have
dozens - of table rows in similar format.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
