On 10/23/06 10:43 AM, "Benjamin West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> huh? I thought technorati already had attention.xml, not to mention > whatever format attentiontrust uses. That was quite a while ago. The current work at rethinking attention.xml is here: http://microformats.org/wiki/attention As you can see, not much attention (so to speak) has been given to it, mostly as a result of the market not paying much attention to that space. You're welcome to contribute to the pages linked therein per the process if this is something you find interest in. Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
