>> just a discouraged usage You are recommending a discouraged usages?
>> cardinal sin Is this a pragmatic group that I'm working with, or a bunch of religious zealots that I've managed to get entangle with? -Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ciaran McNulty Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:15 AM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement? On 10/26/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still not convinced. I've only heard generalities and no > specifics on anything I've heard regarding my use-case. RDF is far to > complicated for the average person creating HTML; one reason why I > don't think it will ever fly. I still know of nothing else besides > Microformats that can fill this role; can you give me some specifics that: > > * Is very simple to add > * Doesn't require access to <head> > * Can be done today <a rel="bookmark" href="[whatever]"></a> kind of does what you're talking about, and it's probably just a discouraged usage rather than a cardinal sin against microformats. -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
