Hello Andy, Does the status of them really matter?
The specifications are there... and people can read them... and use them if they choose to. IMO... it would be better for these Microformats to become widely used before making these specifications "hard in stone". Perhaps there's some problems with them they we didn't foresee. And we need to amend or change some of these specifications. See ya On 10/26/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >The 'wiki' page on rel-enclosure: > > <http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-enclosure> > >say that its spec (sic) is a draft, as of 2005-06-21 > >Is that still the case and, if so, has nothing changed in over a year? >[and so on] Anyone? -- Andy Mabbett Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
