>> Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this.
But what I'm hearing is that if it's not visible it cannot go through that process... -Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Barrett Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:38 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement? On Oct 26, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dr. > Ernie Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> As long as you don't call it a microformat, feel free to experiment. >> :-) > > Why shouldn't he call it a microformat? > Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this. -Colin [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/process _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
