A question about xFolk:[1] Is it invalid to include the TAGGEDLINK
inside the DESCRIPTION, and as a value of the same class attribute as
used for the XFOLKENTRY?
My example code:
<div class="xfolkentry description">
<p>Joi Ito asks, <a href="http://joi.ito.com/archives/2006/10/22/
is_youtube_web_20.html">Is YouTube "Web 2.0"</a> as a follow-up to a
post by Lawrence Lessig, <a href="http://lessig.org/blog/archives/
003570.shtml" class="taggedlink">"The Ethics of Web 2.0."</a> Lessig
specifically differentiates between "true sharing" and "fake
sharing." For Lessig, YouTube is a "fake sharing" site because it
does not allow users to download content; all traffic is directed
back to YouTube, thus YouTube, not the users, essentially controls
the content.</p>
</div>
thanks!
Jeremy
[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/xfolk
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
