Again, and I don't mean to sound dismissal:
What does the inclusion of 'total number of pages' grant you here?
If you can't grab total number of pages, does your plan of absolute
bird book aggregation fail miserably?
It seems to me that the citation aggregator would be/could be doing
something useful with the citation that it has to get the user to a
place where total number of pages could be learned.
Knowing the full number of pages in a work brings you really nowhere
closer to actually 'getting' the cited work in question. That, in my
mind, is the complete 'point' and 'scope' of a citation. To help
people who are looking for the work that is being mentioned to locate
it for themselves, whether that be hunting them down manually (via the
traditionial APA, MLA, Chicago styles) or by machine (through
OpenURL).
-Ross.
On 11/16/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott
Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> So, if page count is out of the scope of hCite, and if it turns out
>>(from my observation about media-info) that it doesn't fit into the
>>media-info format, would page count just not be marked up at all?
>
>What exactly would we gain from this markup in terms of functionality?
The ability to scrape pages listing books, and use the results to build
a page like:
<http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/biblio/warwks.htm>
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
