Hello, On 11/17/06, Chris Messina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think that makes any sense. You should make positive assertions about data, not negative ones...
Why? Andy is in fact trying to make a negative assertion, of the "license" token.
and why bother with a "not-a-license" schema? There's far too many negatives... as in licenses that it wouldn't be....
Andy might want to name one (or a few) specific licenses that it is not.
I think we ought only deal with what things *are* and not what they *aren't*.
That's fine, but they you need to put the "negative" into the token... as in "nolicense" or something like that. See ya
Chris On 11/17/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Andy, > > On 11/17/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm starting to look at using rel="license". Am I right in thing that it > > can be used to indicate that a page is NOT available under a license, as > > well as for those that are? For instance: > > > > This page is <a rel="license" > > href="http://www.example.com/copyright>copyright Example Ltd. > > 2006</a> and may not be reproduced. > > I think that to indicate that something is NOT available under a > certain license you'd really need something like a "norel" attribute. > As in... > > <a norel="license" href="...">...</a> > > Or... you'd need a negative of the "license" token... maybe > "nolicense" to use with the "rel" attribute... as in... > > <a rel="nolicense" href="...">...</a> > > > See ya
-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
