Hi, I can't tell from the ending of the most recent trail of emails about the citation uf whether a consensus was reached about encoding page values and ranges, or if everyone just got tired after 51 emails.
There was some evidence of research that I think ought to be put on the citation-brainstorming page in the form of examples from the web using each kind of page / page range encoding. It's easier to find it for reference that way... I'd like to keep this moving if possible, and remind people of the danger of trying to get it perfect the first time around - note that existing citation formats like bibtex and RIS are emphatically not perfect and are still very useful. More than anything, we need a working imperfect format so that tools can begin to grow, and we can iteratively improve the format as neccessary. Thanks, -mike -- Michael McCracken UCSD CSE PhD Candidate research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/ misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
