Mike, can you explain what you mean in the context of the citation format?
I haven't been following many of the other threads on this list this week, so I don't know what you're referring to. Thanks! -mike On 12/7/06, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ironically, this sounds like another real-world (i.e. not hypothetical) example of the need to provide a way to differentiate microformats. -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/ > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael McCracken > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:05 PM > To: Microformats Discuss > Subject: Re: Re: RE: [uf-discuss] [citation] url field > > This seems to have been buried - so again, to anyone > interested in hCite: > > I want to define a new field "URL" to denote an http URL that > points to the location of a copy of the cited work. > > URIs that encode an identifier of the work can be combined > with this field, but do not need to be. > > I understand that the name "URL" may overlap a bit with URI, > and something like "downloadlink", etc. might be more direct, > but I argue that "URL" is the better choice because it is the > most common name already in use in our examples from the web. > > Can we discuss this revised version of the proposal (or just > vote on it?) > > Thanks, > -mike _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Michael McCracken UCSD CSE PhD Candidate research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/ misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
