No, not multiple containers, just a single container. I'd just seen the first (book) example and presumed that there weren't any containers at all. So there isn't a problem really.
alf. Michael McCracken wrote: > Sorry, which example? > > There's a container element in my old straw format, and there's a > container element in the citeproc output example, but I didn't think > we had any examples with multiple containers. > > -mike > > On 12/8/06, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Actually, there is currently a container in one of the examples - I >> was looking at the book example which obviously doesn't have one. >> >> alf. >> >> On 08 Dec 2006, at 17:49, Alf Eaton wrote: >> >> > In our earlier straw proposal <http://microformats.org/wiki/ >> > citation-irc-notes-2006-04-09#Straw_Proposals>, the metadata for >> > the container of the article was in a class="container" block, >> > whereas in the current straw proposal <http://microformats.org/wiki/ >> > citation-brainstorming#Working_straw_schema> it's in the same block >> > as the metadata for the article itself. >> > >> > The main occasion I can think of where this could be a problem is >> > if the item is found in multiple containers (eg a track on two >> > different albums, or a syndicated news article). Should there be a >> > separate hcitation for each occurence, or should they be condensed >> > into one with multiple containers? >> > >> > alf. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > microformats-discuss mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> microformats-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
