In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Andrieu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Which means that URI profiles are /effectively/ required if you want to
>be assured that standards-compliant parsers will pick them up your
>microformats.
>
>Yea! I think profiles are great. So, why not formalize the
>requirement?
1) If profiles are mandatory (or implicitly required by p*rser
behaviour), what happens to people who cannot edit the "head" element
(blog or CMS users, for instance)?
2) Rather than having a profile for each uF (and, presumably,
near-duplicate profiles for nested uFs such as geo or adr in hCard?) why
not have one over-arching profile for all microformats?
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
