This is a useful reply and seems relevant to authors/implementors and to parsers (though parsing doesn't belong on this list).
If it's not been done already, could this be added to the wiki under versioning practices? Chris On 12/13/06, Ciaran McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/13/06, Steve Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This, to my mind, is sub-optimal: the version of the format in use > isn't something most (if any) users care about and, ideally, shouldn't > be required to be part of the content. For Microformats that have an XMDP profile this is at least in part solved, a page using hCard would, for instance, have the following: <html profile="http://www.w3.org/2006/03/hcard";> Which clearly references a time-based version of the hCard profile. Presumably if hCard is updated, then new profile URLs will be established. However because hListing is still a draft, there isn't a profile to link to, so I don't know if there's a solution for you. The status of the draft format is so much in flux, it might not be practical to start 'version numbering' them just yet anyhow. -Ciaran _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- Chris Messina Citizen Provocateur & Open Source Ambassador-at-Large Work: http://citizenagency.com Blog: http://factoryjoe.com/blog Cell: 412 225-1051 Skype: factoryjoe This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
