Paul, what do think?
I personally think that the qa is a good idea, I belive that you would be easily able to seperate questions and answers out and you will be able to start infering meaning from the text inside the qa section, however like with all microformats it is useless unless people use it (and if it is only you and me then there is little point in having a microformat because only ourselves will be publishing and consuming our own data). I don't belive at the moment that people will be bothered with microformats unless the tools are there that create them without people knowing about them, but obviously when you get to that level of integration I don't think microformats will be needed at all. However on a lighter note, as far as I am aware the dl, dt suffice (although it looks like dt is not ment for questions) I don't think classes are needed to distinguish questions and answers, and if this can start to get used by people I have lots of ideas for it. Paul On 14/12/06, Ciaran McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/06, Taylor Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This might break when there are multiple answers, not sure if one to many dt 2 dd is ok, but a surrounding <di> would help. One-to-many DT/DD is allowed, as are many-to-many. <dl> <dt>A term</dt> <dt>Another term</dt> <dd>A definition</dd> <dd>Another definition</dd> </dl> It's a DT that follows a DD that 'starts' a new block, if that makes sense? -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
