Siegfried Gipp wrote: > > Mike, interesting list. > > > 1.) Includes visible-only > > Yeah, microformats only represent visible data. > Sure? Think of: > <link rel="tag" href="http://www.microformats.org/xfolk"; > title="xfolk"/>
When I've discussed proposing numerous non-visible Microformats, Tantek (and others) told me "no" (numerous times.) I can dig up some quotes if need be. So I was documenting and clarifying philosophy, not prior deviations from. > Don't forget xhtml :) It was assumed. > Unfortunately. Although microformats could be quite useful > for other types of web resources, too. Agreed. -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
