At 07:41 +0000 20.12.2006, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
On 12/20/06, Chris Messina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 You could also use the absense of certain XFN values as a stopgap...
 At least you know that the folks without sweatheart or spouse haven't
 removed themselves from the pool!

Notwithstanding the claim that "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a young man in possession of a fortune must be in want of a wife"[1], there are folks who don't have a sweetheart or a spouse who aren't looking to hook up.

        "I can't understand it, Mother Superior. Since I added the
         XFN information to the convent's website, we've all been
         bombarded with email."

There are all kinds of inferences that it's dangerous to draw from an incomplete description.

What if one's sweetheart doesn't have a URL (insane as that sounds in
this day and age)? :-)

My sweetheart has several URLs, but for a variety of reasons I don't want to cite any of them with a 'sweetheart' relation (and she wouldn't want me to either).

Which raises the whole question for me with XFN, which is a practical one, rather than a technical one: do we really want the world to know all that stuff about us? I keep finding myself torn between the desire to implement XFN just because it's such a cool idea, and the feeling that 'No, the world does not need a traversable graph of all my relationships'. On the future day that I'm arrested for harboring thoughts unfriendly to the Regime, do I want them to have a machine-readable list of all my friends? Or do I want some future scammer/spammer to be able to go to my friend and say "Angus gave me your address and said we should get in touch." (A message that began "Hey, _______, Angus says you have a small penis." could get me into all kinds of trouble). One day marking up your relationships with XFN might seem as naive as putting your email address on your site.

To use or not to use XFN is a decision that everyone has to make for themselves. One thing that I think I might use more readily would be an XFN for non-human entities. I could imagine tagging links to sites that I've built with markers like "blog", "vanitysite", "business", "project", "client", "employer" and so forth. Again, there are potential pitfalls, but it's a little less intimate than XFN as it stands now.

Angus



[1] "Pride and Prejudice", Jane Austen
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to