I'm not sure who originally wrote: > Tantek suggests I'm being > a bad scientist by allowing myself to look for patterns.
To be clear, collecting examples (data) and looking for patterns is exactly what the process asks you to do. Others skip the collecting examples (data) step and simply dream up patterns based on their intuition (or "expertise") - perhaps that is what you mean by "allowing myself to look for patterns". That non-scientific technique has been tried in many (most) standards and results more often than not in bloated overly complex (certainly not "micro") standards. There are exceptions, where an individual with exceptional discipline and near obsession with simplicity makes something small and elegant, but they are the exception, not the rule. I've written up more on this here in order to hopefully clarify this distinction and answer this question preemptively in the future: http://microformats.org/wiki/why-examples Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
