In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frances Berriman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>This is exactly the issue we came up with when we started discussing a >content-rating format a few months back, and previous again to that >[1]. Thank you. >It's very difficult to come up with a universal standard for >describing content and it's "safety". Yet there are many existing standards for doing so; which are far more considered and granular than the binary "NSFW". What happened to the uF "requirement" for research into existing practices? >[1] >http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats- >discuss/2006-July/004942.html That article suggests linking to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSFW> using rel-tag. It doesn't say what happens if/ when that article is deleted. -- Andy Mabbett Merry Bloomin' Christmas! _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
