On 1/22/07, Nir Yariv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last week in Boston we were discussing Pingerati and "how do you find
> microformats" (in general). One passing idea I had was that search
> engines should supply a CSS element selector. So for example, to find
> Tantek's hCard we could search "tantek css:vcard". Neatly, this shows
> one of the great benefits of microformats -- by working in HTML data
> world, we gain the benefits of existing tools but still work with
> data.

Opting for a solution that requires changes on the search engine side
(eg, crawling CSS files) might not be the best path, IMHO. It means
relying on search engines on several points:

1. Motivation - while by definition everyone reading this is
interested in Microformats, I don't know how many people working on
search engines are even aware of MFs.

2. Implementation - once the motivation is there, you're relying on
different search engines to implement the standard correctly and
completely. (Admittedly, it won't be hard to implement. But big
companies occasionally like to put their own spin on standards...)

3. Sharing -  above reasons by nature will limit the number of engines
which will support the MF search. This increases the vulnerability of
MF-search based apps to moves like Google's recent SOAP API
deprecation.

In any case, if we're already asking publishers to modify their
output, I think it would be more likely to catch on if it provides
instant results, by working with existing search engines.

Again, we're not asking anyone to read CSS file; we're asking them to
index the "class" attributes of HTML they're already crawling. We
already know that Google does look at this information (they did a
report on it last year) and I'm fairly sure that there are a number of
search companies aware of microformats. There are very few
implementation issues: most programmers, including those at many
search companies, are aware how to break up a space separated list of
words.

--
David Janes
Founder, BlogMatrix
http://www.blogmatrix.com
http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to