I agree; I think that we should use the -new list for research/ discussion of *new* ideas for microformats. It would be confusing to move something to another list that has always been discussed here.
-- + Nick Drago + e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + w: http://weekendcycling.com On 2/7/07, Benjamin West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/7/07, Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, is the microformats-new mailing list now the appropriate place for > discussing hCite development? > > Thanks, > -mike Good question. My personal opinion is that we should kind of grandfather older stuff, while encouraging newcomers with new ideas to the -new list. I think some others will have other opinions. My feeling is that hcite should remain here; because hcite discussion has always happened here, it would be inconsistent to suddently switch venues. It's kind of confusing, which is why I never liked the name "-new" to begin with, however it did win the votes. -Ben
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
