At 02:32 -0500 04.03.2007, Mike Schinkel wrote:
Edward O'Connor wrote:
If the intent is simply to document the existing, legacy
technologies that rely on such URLs (such as robots.txt),
that seems reasonable to me.
I'd be interested in documenting [1] them .
Does anyone of any other initiatives to define Well Known Names besides
these:?
http://mysite.foo/robots.txt
http://mysite.foo/favicon.ico
http://mysite.foo/w3c/p3p.xml
http://mysite.foo/sitemap.xml
http://mysite.foo/crossdomain.xml
http://mysite.foo/smbmeta.xml
You could add:
http://mysite.foo/siteinfo.xml
although whether that's "well-known" is a matter of terminology,
given that few people have actually heard of it. It seems that the
SiteInfo 'standard' as proposed at:
http://a9.com/-/company/help/siteinfo/
is quietly dying, and the A9 SiteInfo plug-in is no longer
maintained. Which may or may not be regrettable: I quite like the
idea, but it can be seen as just one more piece of clutter in your
root directory.
Angus
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
