Michael McCracken wrote:

We need to deal with bibliographic details for things like chapters in
a book, articles in a journal or magazine, and issues in a series.

For designing a format, the main problem is that there are duplicate
items that need to be scoped - for instance, both the article and the
journal have a title.

I actually brought this up in December in response to Brian's straw format[1], but the words I thought to use were "collection" or "in". I like "in" largely because some citation formats actually use that word to describe this type of
relationship:

The American Chemical Society: [2]

> Almlof, J.; Gropen, O. Relativistic Effects in Chemistry.
> In Reviews in Computational Chemistry Lipkowitz, K.B.,
> Boyd, D.B., Eds.; VCH: New York, 1996; Vol. 8, pp 206-210.

American Psychological Society: [3]

> James, N. E. (1988). Two sides of paradise: The Eden myth according
> to Kirk and Spock. In D. Palumbo (Ed.), Spectrum of the fantastic
> (pp. 219-223). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Chicago Style: [4]

> Repgen, K. 1987. What is a 'Religious War'? In Politics and society
> in Reformation Europe, edited by E. I. Kouri and T. Scott, 311-328.
> London: Macmillan

"In", being a preposition, sounds kludgy on its own, but reads very well
within the code:

<p class="hcite">
  ...
  <span class="in hcite">
    ..
  </span>
</p>

Note too that this problem exists for other parts of citations, like
publisher data: most book citations are published with the city of
publication, but this is more appropriately the `adr` field of a nested
hcard for the publisher. Here, nested data is appropriate to the top- level
citation as well.

[1]: http://microformats.org/wiki/citation-brainstorming#Book
     (toward the end of the section)
[2]: http://www.library.ubc.ca/scieng/chem121/module3/module3_7.html
[3]: http://www.liu.edu/CWIS/CWP/library/workshop/citapa.htm
[4]: http://www.libs.uga.edu/ref/chicago.html

--
Ryan Cannon

Interactive Developer
MSI Student, School of Information
University of Michigan
http://RyanCannon.com

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to