James Craig wrote:
Dan Champion wrote:

Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
Mike Kaply wrote:
Both upcoming and eventful do not have dashes in their dates.
They will need to be evangelized.

Wikevent.org's got it right <http://wikevent.org/en/Joan_Armatrading_2007_5_7> we don't need evangelising ;-)

Ditto for Revish - http://www.revish.com/reviews/090613725X/danchamp/ :-)

You guys are missing the point.

I'm well aware of the point of the broader discussion. You missed the point of my post (and I imagine Spike's) which was to show some immediate support for the interim suggestion that Tantek and others have endorsed.

I felt it important to demonstrate that the discussion here is of some practical consequence and is being listened to by those of us actively promoting microformats in the field, and who are also painfully aware of the accessibility issues: Bruce Lawson and I had a brief chat about microformat "abuse" of abbr while he was (presumably) working with you to highlight the issue.

Do you talk that way?

Yes, actually. I'm not the most effective communicator in any space.

Let's not side-track the discussion though. As a solution emerges I will continue to adopt it as I see fit, but will think twice about publicising that effort through this channel.

Cheers,

Dan
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to