Le 1 mai 2007 à 09:53, James Craig a écrit :
The main problem, as I understood it, is that "object[data]"
expects a URI, even if it doesn't know how to handle it, so the
first suggestion is actually requesting the relative path "./
20050125" which causes extra junk 404s (Ex. 1; not necessarily a
bug). Some UAs even requested relative paths for anchored resources
in the page as with the object include-pattern (Ex. 2; probably a
bug and definitely a reason to ditch it).
1. <object class="dtstart" data="20050125">January 25</object>
2. <object class="include" data="#foo"></object>
See what has been done in ["duri" and "tdb" URN namespaces based on
dated URIs][1]
urn:tdb:<date>:<encoded-URI>
Then let's see if it is possible to do something like.
<object class="dtstart"
data="urn:date:2005-01-25">January 25</object>
It could be easily defined at IETF.
And I wonder about
<a class="dtstart"
href="urn:date:2005-01-25">January 25</a>
[1]: http://larry.masinter.net/duri.html#dates
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
