In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Breton
Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>It seems to me that in order to more effectively solve this problem,
>this set of restrictions should be clarified- Here's what I've got so
>far, correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
>Date markup must:
>
>1> be capable of marking up dates from multiple cultures and languages
>2> Follow the DRY principle
>3> Be completely visible
>4> Follow common usage
>5> Be machine readable
>6> Be unambiguous
>
>and the unstated (and perhaps unconcious) restriction
>
>7> Be as similar to iCalendar as possible in form and function.
Not a correction but an addition - I'm surprised, in the light of the
recent debate, that you omitted:
Be accessible
which might be more tightly worded as, say:
Meet WCAG accessibility guidelines
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
