On 6/18/07, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Granted, the behaviour can't be guaranteed in the case of a non-compliant document, but are Microformats actually specified as working in valid, but non-XML-compliant, HTML markup? Surely the only requirement should be that the markup can be parsed unambiguously into a DOM tree?
Most proxy-type services seem to run everything through Tidy anyhow. I can't think of any uFs I'm aware of that wouldn't 'work' in HTML, although some of the nesting features wouldn't work if people did (for instance): <p class="vcard"><em class="fn">Ciaran</p> <p>McNulty</em></p> (which I think is valid HTML) -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
