In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian
Suda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Recently, there has been alot of discuss on the IRC about implementing
hAtom in Operator. As long as there are outstanding issues and
questions about how things work, then i don't consider the spec
"complete".
Before moving to the specifications section, drop a note to
microformats-discuss and wait a day or two for major objections.
If none are forthcoming, move the microformat to the
specifications area. This move will wake up any sleeping
editors, and they may raise an objection and move you back to
draft. If you have followed the process, now is the time to pin
them down. At this juncture, any remaining issues should be easy
to resolve.
(Section quoted in full.)
i'll try and get a full list of outstanding issues available. I
believe that we need to flush out the test suite and compare several
implementations. At the moment we have atleast 2 that i am aware of
(maybe hKit too?).
I think it is a matter for the Authors of the spec to suggest moving
the spec from draft forward when they feel comfortable - maybe they
are more aware of issues than others?
That was written in April; is there any news?
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
