Benjamin West wrote:
http://tantek.com/log/2005/06.html#d03t2359 "Principles of visibility
and human friendliness".
One question invisible metadata raises is if it's not worth seeing,
why is it worth publishing?
Because tools/extensions expose them to end users in a way that is far
more user/human friendly than merely making the raw metadata visible.
Whether or not authors "forget" to update the metadata, or purposely try
to game it, if it's not visible is an authoring/policy issue, not a
technical issue that should be solved by a language's specification
("because some bad people tried to do bad things with it, we're just not
giving you the opportunity, full stop").
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
