Maybe this just shows how n optimization is a bad idea?
Just because someone's name is Ludacris, doesn't mean it's a nick name. And just because someone's name is 50 Cent doesn't mean their first name is 50 and their last name is Cent. Mike Kaply On 7/3/07, Pelle W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andy Mabbett skrev: >> Unfortunately, the database doesn't tell me whether an artist is a >> person or a group. > I empathise - I had the same trouble with bands vs. artist in the > relevant infobox on Wikipedia, Fortunately, it is possible for other > parameters used there, to distinguish between them. >> So in the meantime it's the best I can do with available data... > I wonder whether "no microformats" would be better than "broken > microformats"? > > What do others think? I think that maybe all artist kan be considered a company because frankly their names are trademarks no matter if their own, a bands or something else. Britney Spears or Paris Hilton could both practically be caled Britney Spears Inc. or Paris Hilton Inc. It's better with broken microformats than no - but perhaps it's better broken the way I suggest than the way it is now? / Pelle _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
