Well, it's been two days since this thread began, and I wanted to echo back what I've heard from the discussion. [Fair warning, I've been flying quite a bit, and will be for the next week, so I may fall a bit out-of-date...]

As soon as I first edited the wiki page to describe this strategy, Andy reached out to me to inquire how the public-domain release interacted with the original 2004 copyright statement. I don't have any firm ideas at this point; Tantek replied to this thread by taking the admirable step of clarifying that as much as possible for all of the pages that he could, individually removing the 2004 statement from pages he'd edited.

However, as Ernie noted, the wiki medium arguably calls for tracking the contributions of *all* the contributors who modify the pages, above and beyond the stated "authors" of a page/spec. We're hardly proposing any kind of automated checking at this point, but it's an interesting direction for the future.

Andy's initial public reaction did take me aback, though: while he may be correct the PD text currently states that "unless otherwise stated" (because that's what was copied from Wikipedia), the intent is different. Perhaps we should be discussing "unless otherwise prohibited," for example.

More generally,though, I think volunteering in this case makes for better game-theory than holding back until 'everyone else' commits to a more open strategy first. Taking the incremental step of marking your profile clearly states an individual's intent and also sets the stage for finding out whether there *is* community consensus that the public-domain approach is appropriate for microformats.org -- a first among even remotely-standards-like efforts to my knowledge.

Migrating to a new, clearer copyright regime will not happen overnight and must be done clearly and cleanly -- but it begins, I submit, by offering to cooperate in the construction of a new regime. Please consider joining in by adding the release to you user profiles today...

Thanks,
  Rohit Khare
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to