there are python and java versions here, with some tests http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-sample-code
refactoring tests into the HTML + JSON style discussed for hCard et al would be a fine idea. On Aug 2, 2007 3:47 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a good idea. I'll definitely look into existing parsers. I have > located xoxo.rb (http://tinyurl.com/3ygt7e), which should be helpful. > Christian's site seems to be down at the moment. > > I see that Hixie raised a similar issue a while back: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo-issues > > :DG< > > > On 8/2/07, Ernest Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Dmitri, > > > > On Aug 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > > > My intent is to use XOXO for configuration (remember plists discussion > > > from a while back?) and I would like to make sure I don't write code > > > that does something unacceptable or illogical. > > > > > > Since there is not much heard anymore about the glorious XOXO > > > adventures, I am wondering if the world has moved on to something > > > bigger and better? > > > > I think XOXO is considered a "solved" problem (for some value of > > "solved") which may be why there isn't much chatter. Your solution > > sounds reasonable to me -- have you compared it to the existing parsers? > > > > -enp > > _______________________________________________ > > microformats-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
