On Aug 17, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
Really, microformats.org needs to "bless" one of the many
replacements for the abbr-design-pattern. I'm sure I'm not the
only one who's waiting for a clear direction before proceeding.
In the microformats process, solutions as "blessed" by real-world
factors. In this case, there's testing going on, documented here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/assistive-technology-abbr-results
If you'd like to help do some testing in real screen readers, that
would hasten this process. But choosing a "solution" without knowing
how well it would actually solve the problem, nor whether it would
introduce new problems, is a bad idea.
Peace,
Scott
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
