In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric A. Meyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Could you to provide the evidence that was used to conclude that Andy
failed to adhere to the "be nice" guideline /after/ the
private warning?
You mean besides posting a private message to a public list?
The message from which I quoted was not "private", It was sent to me "on
behalf of the microformats administration"
By the administrators. Scott was simply the administrator who gave
public notice of the action.
Interesting, that-- I always thought secret back-room cabals tried
to keep evidence of their abuses secret, and that people responsible
for shepherding a growing community and doing their best to preserve it
were up front about their actions. How I got those two switched around
I'll never know.
You're quite correct; so how come the transactions of the group who
"shepherd" us (and who wants to be a sheep?) are secret; the full
membership of that group is secret, and references to the former's
existence have been removed from the "wiki":
<http://microformats.org/wiki?title=mailing-lists&diff=14391&oldid=14389#General_guidelines>
?
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
