Brian Suda (21 août 2007 - 18:47) :
On 8/21/07, Edward O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the interest of forward-compatibility, I think using dfn/@title
is a
bad idea.
The HTML 5 draft goes into much more detail about <dfn> then any
previous HTML version, specifying both how to find the <dfn>'s
term, and
how to find the relevant <dfn> for some use of the term elsewhere
in the
document.
--- i wouldn't worry too much about HTML5.
The definition of [HTML 5 dfn][1] is not incompatible with [HTML 4
dfn][2]
It is just a better definition, less vague.
For the record, XHTML 2 WD gives another interesting pattern for
[XHTML 2 dfn][3] with the attribute role.
Though as you said html 5 is only an *editor* draft for now.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#the-dfn
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#edef-DFN
[3]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-text.html#edef_text_dfn
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
