On 10/09/2007, Frances Berriman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/09/2007, Michael Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just a quick question to ask whether hatom requires an updated? > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom#Schema > > > > says it is > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom#Entry_Updated > > > > Says it's a should and parsers will fall back to published date > > > > Yeah, that's right. I've found that many people tend to just use > published though (myself included), and forego ever using updated. > > What're you having problems with?
Apologies for the reply to myself, but I just spotted what you mean... the schema refers to published as a MUST and the specific information as a SHOULD, yeah? I'd treat updated as a SHOULD. It's the date in general (published or updated) that should be described as the MUST, as far as I'm aware. -- Frances Berriman http://fberriman.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
