From: Francois Lafortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 7-Nov-07, at 12:36 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > Then follow-up with reading POSH resources: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/posh > > I read that, I find the word "semantic" ambiguous in some contexts, > just as "tabular data" may be ambiguous to some.
In summary, semantic is where you use the elements to provide as much correct meaning for their content as possible. It is the discussion of what is the correct meaning, where we get into the field of semantics. Semantics can be like a philosophy discussion, but about html instead rather than humans. I came across today what semantically beautiful code looks like. http://css-tricks.com/what-beautiful-html-code-looks-like/ Then there are some good presentations about semantic html. http://tantek.com/presentations/2005/09/elements-of-xhtml/ http://www.ermanz.govt.nz/news-events/archives/presentations/semantichtml.html And other resources that provide a good rundown of what's expected http://brainstormsandraves.com/articles/semantics/structure/ -- Paul Wilkins _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
