On Dec 8, 2007 2:22 AM, Jeremy Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I don't think that every use of the CITE element *requires* > an accompanying citation (using Q or BLOQCKQUOTE). I think that Scott > is write when he says that context is the key criteria:
The CITE element doesn't require that the citation be explicitly marked up, but there has to be a citation of some form for the CITE element to be involved. This is right: <p>According to <cite>the Wikipedia article on HTML</cite>, HTML is defined in formal specifications that were developed and published throughout the 1990s.</p> This is wrong: <p>My favourite book is <cite>The Reality Dysfunction</cite> by <cite>Peter F. Hamilton</cite>.</p> The above examples are explicit examples that the specifications give to help teach you right from wrong. You will need to convince the working group that created the specifications otherwise, before your desired use is to be considered right. -- Paul Wilkins _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
