On Dec 17, 2007 7:01 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NB: This email isn't intended as a general endorsement of TITLE on > non-linking A. I'm deeply sceptical about misusing the TITLE attribute > for human-unfriendly data, especially on anything other than an empty > SPAN. I'm just saying I don't buy Martin's SEO-based argument against > non-linking A in particular.
Thanks for going through this. Because the HTML spec doesn't allow for what we're trying to achieve, one possibility was to use non-linking anchors, but there are several issues with that. I still prefer the abbr include pattern though. The PT2M23S is to indicate a duration of time, but using such a format meets resistance in that it's not easy for people to correctly markup in such a manner. Another option is to use hh:mm:ss instead. This is indicating an actual moment in time. Is it viable to consider that if we play a track from midnight, that we can specify that moment in time when it ends? <abbr title="00:02:23">2:23</abbr> -- Paul Wilkins _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss