On Mon, January 7, 2008 10:03, Tom Morris wrote: > The rel-tag specification says that tags ought to be HTTP URIs.
> In a page I'm authoring at the moment, I'm using non-HTTP URIs as tags > - specifically I'm using irc: URIs (like > irc://irc.freenode.net/microformats) as tags. > Operator seems fine with it. Operator finds no tag in: <a href="tel:+441213039944" rel="tag">0121 303 9944</a> > It seems to me that so long as the target resource URI conforms to > the tag URI structure, it shouldn't matter what protocol it uses. Likewise; though in the above example we might need to define that the tag is: tel:+441215555555 or: +441215555555 as there is no slash to act as a delimiter. -- Andy Mabbett ** via webmail ** _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
