In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip
Tellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It
>> is just another "service" available @ the phone number, just like voice,
>> fax, etc.
>
>so what we're looking at, is really two axes... one is the service
>running at the other end of a telephone number (voice, sms, fax, data),
>and the second is the location of this service (home, office, mobile).
Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more:
service:
voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone
connection:
landline, mobile
(though even then landline vs. mobile can be a vague
distinction; and is perhaps becoming increasingly irrelevant.
Then there's VoIP...)
use:
personal, work
So I can have, for instance, a:
work-landline-fax
which is different to each of my:
personal-mobile-[fax+voice+sms]
my:
work-mobile-[fax+voice+sms]
my:
work-landline-voice
and my:
work-landline-[voice+freephone]
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
