In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian
Suda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 09/01/2008, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeremy
>> Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>
>> >> Perhaps the rule should be that the hCard is for a place if the
>> >>"fn" is
>> >> on *any* address ("adr") child-component [1] (e.g. "fn locality" or
>> >>"fn
>> >> street-address")?
>> >
>> >This strikes me as being pretty workable. I'm mentally kicking the
>> >tyres and this seems like quite a robust solution.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> In that case, would people agree, or object, if we: ....
>
>--- some additional time to review this would be nice. Jeremy brought
>this to my attention 2 days ago.
The proposal was posted to the wiki and mailing list in the early hours
of 31 December 2007:
<http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcard-brainstorming&diff=prev&oldid=24038>
<http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-December/011169.html>
> Now we are asking to change the spec.
>More time is needed to fully look over the implications of this
>change.
That's what you're being asked to do.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
