Michael Smethurst wrote: > On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the >>> interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? >> We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions >> both in favor of and against including RDFa support in a future >> release of Firefox.
+1 for me. +1 for our company. It would be a real shame if only one way of extracting semantics from a web page were supported in Firefox. If Firefox is serious about the semantic web, it would be nice to see support for all the methods of expressing semantics on web pages. Note the recent proposal on creating a unified representation for semantic objects (uF, RDFa, eRDF): http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-dev/2008-January/000410.html This would make it much easier for Firefox to support semantics in pages. It isn't technically difficult to support all of them, so I see no reason not to do so. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
