> but in my humble opinion, more interesting would be to have this ratio > for each year with *only the new pages* created during the year. > Unfortunately because there is no uniform way to sign the date of > pages, and because HTTP is even a worse shape than HTML, it is almost > impossible to evaluate.
On could perform such an audit with hAtom published values. Either that or use the RSS timestamp or timestamp in the URL. This would suffer from sampling bias though because most blog hosts at least PRETEND to care about standards. Thought it would still be interesting to compute the stats. Kevin -- Founder/CEO Tailrank.com Location: San Francisco, CA AIM/YIM: sfburtonator Skype: burtonator Work: http://spinn3r.com and http://tailrank.com Blog: http://feedblog.org Cell: 415-637-8078 Fax: 1-415-358-419 PIN: 0092 _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
