Is the problem that the page contains multiple video elements? If so using hAtom to define them as separate entries may help clarify this, especially in conjunction with rel-enclosure.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Angus, > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Angus McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm in the process of adding 'rel="license"' in the relevant places on > > blip.tv, a video-sharing site, and I've run squarely into the 'open issue' > > raised by Evan on 2006-04-07 (in the wiki). Namely, there's no obvious way > > to specify that the license applies to a content element on a page - a > > picture, a video - rather than the page as a whole. > > (I should probably check this before posting... but I'm in a rush...) > >From what I remember of the HTML spec, an <a> element with the "rel" > attribute set applies to all or part of the HTML page. > > An example of this is rel-bookmark used for hAtom. > > So... the rel-license could apply just to the video. > > >From a machine point-of-view, there's no way (that I'm aware of) to > differentiate when the rel-license applies to the whole page or part > of the page. > > Suggestions welcome. > > > See ya > > -- > Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. > http://ChangeLog.ca/ > > Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
