Hello Gordon,

We had a discussion about this quite a while ago.  (Nothing actionable
really come out of it though, if I remember correctly.)

You may want to search the Microformats mailing list for it.  (Since
it is quite relevant.)


One thing though... having rel="nsfw" probably isn't the correct way
to "mark" that, since "rel" has a very specific semantic meaning.
(But that's just a detail.  Maybe "class" would be more appropriate.)

-- 
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/


Vlog Razor... Vlogging News...  http://vlograzor.com/


On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Gordon Oheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just reading a blog about bad use of Photoshop that linked to 
> "not-safe-for-work" sites every now and then. Made me wonder if we could use 
> a microformat that indicates "non-suitable for work" links and the likes? I 
> could imagine a FF plugin that recognizes page elements tagged as nsfw and 
> changes their display to none or something like that when you are at work. 
> Could also use nsfc (for children). Google could crawl this and protect my 
> unborn kids. What do you think? Useful?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work
>
> Cheers, Gordon
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to