On the abbr-design-pattern page, markup rejections section [1] is the following text:

OBJECT with param value. (requires significant extra markup and CSS in order to *behave* correctly)


Can anyone provide more detail about this parenthetical rejection explanation? I vaguely recall discussion about this, something specific to Safari I think, but couldn't find it in the archive. I've done some quick testing and <object>s seem to render cleanly as block elements, as do <param>s. The latter surprised me, as I didn't expect an empty <param> to render at all. Was that the problem with this proposal or was it something else? I'm wondering if <object> and <param> could be feasible in any context for semantic markup, or if there's just a specific subset of contexts in which we've seen a problem.

[1] 
http://microformats.org/wiki/abbr-design-pattern-alternatives#Markup_Rejections

Peace,
Scott

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to