On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> Looks quite good. Personally I'd have converted JSON objects into definition
> lists using DT for the key and DD for the value though. Then perhaps add the
> key to the class of each *as well*. So, for instance:
>
> {
> "key1" : "value1" ,
> "key2" : "value2"
> }
>
> becomes:
>
> <dl class="json-object">
> <dt class="key1">key1</dt>
> <dd class="key1">value1</dt>
> <dt class="key2">key2</dt>
> <dd class="key2">value2</dt>
> </dl>
I had initially done this but came to the conclusion that this put key1 into
the html as content and that seemed wrong.
>
> Which should be more flexible with regards to styling, and probably more
> useful when looked at without CSS. If you happen to like the unordered list
> look, then:
I never intended to use the results of this library for exploring the JS. I
suppose that this should be made more explicit.
>
> dl.json-object dt { display: none; }
> dl.json-object dd { list-style-type: circle; }
And this was exactly how I styled the result. :)
>
> However, have you considered what happens when the object keys contain
> whitespace characters? e.g.
>
> {
> "some key" : "some value"
> }
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss@microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>
--
Nirmal Patel
www.nirmalpatel.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
