On Jul 18, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Lisa Goodlin wrote:
Thanks for the replies. They were very helpful.
On 7/18/08 4:11 AM, "Brian Suda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As i read over the wiki page, the term "suboptimal" caught my
attention. These are people who are trying to add semantic mark-up,
and while not 100% valid we label them as "suboptimal". This is not
very inviting to new members. Can someone think of a better term,
possibly something like "incomplete" or "needs improvement" or
"missing properties". We should encourage improvement rather than
berating failure.
Does anyone have an idea of how to improve this term?
-brian
"Could use improvement" is a bit friendlier.
One thing to do would be to describe exactly how they are "suboptimal"
-- missing properties, not entirely human- and machine-readable, and
so forth, to give specific help to those who would "optimize" them.
Dave
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
