2008/8/28 Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe each spec should have a required minimum draft iterations before it > can go 1.0, allowing people to participate at different levels. Those > passionate about subject matter will take interest at the 0.1 stage, those > who are simply active within microformats in general would review specs at > the second or third draft to protect against process violations and > fast-tracking. I wouldn't want anything too strict, but all specs iterate > draft versions anyway, so it might be wise to map them to cue issue review.
Like 'release candidates' for software, you mean? Eg. 1.0-RC1 and 1.0-RC2, which are announced by the core contributors in a "hey, wider community, check this out before we close the door on it" sort of way? Or is that too strict? Chris _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
