I had misread you there, Manu. I apologize. Thanks for clearing it up.
Those 3x bullet points are a great summary. Well done. -- André On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > André Luís wrote: >> Manu, >> the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions >> about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all >> of the hard work the communities have don so far. > > I never said the discussions "trashed" all of our hard work. I said that > some of the discussions "ignore" (some) of the hard work performed by > this community as well as the RDFa community. > >> All it does, from >> what i gathered, is move the semantics from html and places it in a >> separate file/place. > > Right - which both this community and the RDFa community are opposed to: > > 1. We do not want semantics to be placed in separate files. > 2. We do not want vocabularies to be re-defined from site to site. > 3. We want semantic markup to be easy to author for regular people - CSS > is /not/ easy to author. > > That's what I was attempting to point out with my statement. Apologies > if I was not clear :) > > -- manu > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss